Responses Assignments | Online Homework Help

There are two discussions here that need to be responded to thoroughly. Responses must be on APA format 150+words 1-2 legitimate verifiable sources. 

 

 

There are two discussions here that need to be responded to thoroughly . Responses must be on APA format 150+words 1-2 legitimate verifiable sources. Due by Sunday September 15 at 9 AM 36 hours.

This is what the discussion was about in case you don’t remember. You wrote a response to it.

Private Endorsement by Public Official

Thomas Smith runs a company that offers private security guards, CCTV, burglary alarm and other security devices. A police department employee learns that every time after a theft or robbery takes place, Police Inspector Bill Williams advices the victim and bystanders to install security devices from Tom’s company to make their home and shops secure from criminals. Bill even tells them “When you go to Thomas Smith’s office, tell him I’ve sent you, he’ll give you special discount.”

The PD employee confronts Bill about this matter. Bill justifies his action by saying: Yes, I take money from Thomas Smith to endorse his security products for homes and offices. No, I’m not doing anything unethical because I use this money to pay my informers and keep a check on criminal elements. I don’t spend this money on myself or my family.

Even municipal buses and railway-wagons have advertisements, then why is an endorsement by a city official unethical or illegal? Besides, he continues Smith’s security devices are very effective at preventing burglary.

Should the PD employee take steps that would prevent Bill Williams from continuing this endorsement activity?

Yes/No

Why?

Or Why Not?

professional writing services near me

Source:

 

Girimonti Discussion Post#1

 

I believe that this type of behavior is not only a breach of ethics but also unprofessional. As a leader of the law enforcement community, I think making a recommendation for a security company is prudent advice and can definitely help those who may be new to the area. Even endorsing a business you are familiar with would be excusable if they offer the best quality services for the individuals needs. Taking money however, is where the breach occurs. While the Inspector may be using this money to make improvements within the departments, it is an unregulated source of income. The advertisements that are seen on public transit are most likely conducted through legal means where the income generated through the business that is advertised is most likely being reciprocated to regulated improvements within public transportation. I believe that the employee should take the concerns to the inspector as a professional courtesy before legal issues arise.

Response #1

 

Jillcott Discussion Post #2

Should a police officer or any public official use their position to promote a private business… I would say that it depends on the situation. Of course we all know that a government official in no way should endorse a product to help themselves. So in the case of Inspector Wiliams taking money from the security company is unethical, no matter what he is using those funds for. Any funds for a informant should be able to be tracked by the department. The department should therefore take steps to stop Inspector Williams. However according to the U.S. Office of Government Ethics there are a few exceptions and those are

An employee may use their Government position to endorse an organization, product, or person when:

  • statutory authority exists for an agency to promote products, services or organizations;
  • the agency documents compliance with agency requirements or standards; or
  • the agency gives recognition for achievement under an agency program of recognition for accomplishment in support of the agency’s mission.

So if these homes were being broken in to and Inspector Williams promoted a security system being installed is not a unethical thing for him to do.

References

Cornell Law School. (n.d.). Retrieved from 5 CFR § 2635.702 – Use of public office for private gain.: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/5/2635.702

United States Office of Government Ethics. (2016, February 25). Retrieved from Endorsing Organizations, Products, or Persons: https://oge.gov/web/oge.nsf/Resources/Endorsing+Organizations,+Products,+or+Pers

Ons

 

Response #2